Gs Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141853293
- IRS 990-PF coverage
- 2011–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990-PF 2012
- Location
- Honolulu, HI, USA
- Phone
- 8088392771
- Rating
- 21
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Corporate Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $1,864
Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Overview
Mission
Corporate Foundations
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this foundation funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The foundation combined direct charitable work with grants to other organizations or people.
The verdict
REVIEW - The strongest available result is that a large share of spending goes to charitable work. The filing does not identify all grant recipients and a relatively small share of spending goes to grants.
Rating breakdown
- Grant Deployment: NotEnoughData
- Cost Efficiency: 54
- Transparency: 0
- Compliance: 50
- Endowment Health: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Grant Deployment
- Grant deployment ratio: Limited
Cost Efficiency
- Grant expense ratio: 53.6%; rating input score 54; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency
- Grant recipient disclosure: Scored; rating input score 0
Compliance
- Part VII-B activity disclosures: Limited
- Filing consistency checks: 3; rating input score 100
Endowment Health
- Endowment-health comparison: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Investments: Filed investments detail
- Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2012
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency: Grant recipient disclosure scored 0/100.
- Review — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 54/100.