Grupe Foundation For The Enrichment of Public Education

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680170807
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Stockton, CA, USA
Phone
2094736171
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,030
Expenses
$2,030
Assets
$8

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Greenlaw Grupe Jr (President & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Greenlaw Grupe Jr (President & CEO)
  • Mike Kristoff (CFO)
  • Phyllis L Grupe (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve educational opportunities for the youth of San Joaquin County.

What it reported doing in 2025

The following Organizational achievements were noted in prior years: 1) Provided books and materials for kindergarten through third grade students; 2) Hired and managed one hundred plus high school and college students to tutor third, fourth and fifth grade students in reading skills; 3) In six school districts at twelve high schools and twenty two elementary sites, employed senior citizens and high school students to teach reading skills to elementary students who are below basic grade level in reading skills; 4) Continued the sixth grade reading ambassador program and the St. John's Learning Center Collaborative; 5) Improved the San Joaquin Reads Week, the A+ Teacher Awards and Rotary Read-in as well as the School Secretaries Appreciation Program; and 6) Expanded a pilot 'Art in the Schools' project in local elementary schools.There were no Organization activities during this year. Expenses were allocated to program services during the current year based on expense allocations utilized in prior years as such expenses are/were necessary in order to carry on the Organization's program services in prior years.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 35.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 35.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90% of revenue deployed · 90% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.