Growth Partners Arizona
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 455021995
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Tucson, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 5203829218
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Urban, Community Economic Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,405,055
- Expenses
- $1,180,909
- Assets
- $6,555,783
- Liabilities
- $2,444,788
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDRE T WHITTINGTON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ANDRE T WHITTINGTON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $136,637 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Growth partners Arizona is a u.s. Treasury department-certified community development financial institution with a mission to provide accessible, fair, and responsible loans and support to Arizona nonprofits and economically underserved (continued on schedule o) small business outside the economic mainstream.
What it reported doing in 2024
Growth partners Arizona provides accessible, fair, and responsible loans and support to Arizona nonprofits and economically underserved small business outside the economic mainstream. Expanded access to capital for Arizona small businesses and nonprofits: growth partners Arizona deployed approximately $1.3 million in responsible, mission-aligned financing to 23 borrowers during 2025. This capital supported small businesses and nonprofit organizations across Arizona, with an emphasis on expanding access to financing for organizations and entrepreneurs that have historically faced barriers to traditional sources of capital. (continued on schedule o)provided financial education and business support to more than 1,000 clients: growth partners Arizona provided financial education, technical assistance, and business support to more than 1,000 clients during 2025. This work helped entrepreneurs and small business owners strengthen financial knowledge, improve business decision-making, better understand their financial position, and build greater confidence in preparing for and managing capital.expanded statewide reach and strengthened Arizona's small business ecosystem: growth partners Arizona continued advancing its statewide mission by expanding access to capital across Arizona. Through its direct and indirect lending activities, gpaz has now invested in businesses and organizations across 12 of Arizona's 15 counties, demonstrating significant statewide reach and extending economic opportunity beyond major metropolitan areas. This growing footprint reflects gpaz's commitment to ensuring that entrepreneurs and community organizations throughout Arizona have greater access to the financial resources needed to grow, create jobs, and strengthen their local economies.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 80% for direct work, and 20% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.3%; rating input score 48
- Program expense ratio: 96.2%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: $173.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 50.9%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.55; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.37; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 27.9% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 27.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.9% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 48.3% of revenue deployed · 96.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $137K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.