Grover Cleveland Charter Hs Band Booster Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 815442896
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Reseda, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8188852300
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Music Groups, Bands, Ensembles
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $187,570
- Expenses
- $161,521
- Assets
- $60,363
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LAURA QUISTGAARD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LISA THOMAS (VICE PRESIDE)
- LAURA QUISTGAARD (PRESIDENT)
- ALBY LUCHKO (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the grover cleveland charter hs band booster club shall be to promote the activities of the grover cleveland charter hs band and raise, to the maximum extent possibe, the additional funds not provided by the school, that are required to support band activities while cooperating with the respective officers, parents and band director.
What it reported doing in 2024
The grover cleveland charter hs band booster club has raised funds (and continues to raise funds) to purchase music, instruments, supplies, additional uniforms, and additional coaches for the grover cleveland charter high school band program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.1%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 97.7%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.9%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.6% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.1% of revenue deployed · 97.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $158K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.