Ground Zero Emergency Training Center Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 471789429
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-PF 2015
- Location
- Norman, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4055739773
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Training, Behavior
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $754,187
- Expenses
- $611,361
- Assets
- $2,373,645
- Liabilities
- $420,620
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEN MILLER (PRESIDENT)
- JOE DORMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- REBECCA SWITZER (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID BROWNELL (TRAINER): $128,214 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Strengthen emergency response at the local, state and national levels.
What it reported doing in 2024
Emergency preparedness search and rescue canine team training program produces highly specialized sar canines, valued at $50,000, places them with emergency responders at no charge, and trains them to be a team. The program includes 18 months of intensive canine training in rubble pile, wilderness, scent trailing, and water rescue and recovery. Training for sar teams includes structural collapse, search tactics, basic and advanced medical triage, response to active shooter incidents, hazmat, basic and advanced technical rescue, and mass casualty incidents. Canines learn to search, locate and alert when human scent is detected and are trained to ignore all other smells. Most importantly, they learn to distinguish between the scent of the first responder and the victim who might be buried beneath the rubble. This specialized training means when a trained canine barks to alert the first responder, there is, in fact, a person in need of rescuing. Canines are also trained to navigate unstable footing, including collapsed concrete buildings with glass and nails everywhere. Off-leash training enables the canine, independent of their handler, to search the scene of a disaster more safely and effectively than a human first responder. In 2016, there were only 9 dogs certified in Oklahoma to respond to disaster events and most were nearing retirement age. Ok task force 1, comprised of emergency responders from tulsa and Oklahoma city, had been on a waitlist for over 3 years to receive new canines, putting the task force teams in both cities in a dire position. Ground zero ensures Oklahoma emergency responders always have the minimum number of certified sar canines required to deploy and provides advanced training and continuing educations for sar teams. Ground zero's programs include community education presentations, disaster risk awareness, preparedness and response presentations in community schools, and advanced specialized skill training for emergency responders.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.9%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $139.84 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.9%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.88; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.4% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.9% of revenue deployed · 95.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $582K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.