Groton-dunstable Youth Baseball Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 991639425
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Groton, MA, USA
- Phone
- 9787713633
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Baseball, Softball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $94,894
- Expenses
- $88,458
- Assets
- $67,295
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Josh Pollock (President)
- Nick Keirnan (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Josh Pollock (President)
- Nick Keirnan (Vice President)
- Stephen Donnelly (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Groton-Dunstable Youth Baseball League's (GDYBL) purpose is to provide a safe and healthy environment for all to learn and to grow as individuals and teammates in the game of baseball. The GDYBL strives to provide an equal opportunity to play at an appropriate level, without an undue emphasis on winning, and endorses the values of: Sportsmanship, Respect for the Individual, Enjoyment, Integrity, Pursuit of Excellence, Loyalty and Teamwork
What it reported doing in 2024
The Groton-Dunstable Youth Baseball League (GDYBL) provided a safe and healthy environment for all to learn and to grow as individuals and teammates in the game of baseball in 2025. GDYBL supported over players ranging in age from 3 to 16 in playing baseball during various seasons of the year. GDBYL enabled 270 players in the spring, 86 in the summer, and 134 in the fall season to learn about baseball and teamwork while having fun and competing with neighboring towns.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 69% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.8%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $98K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.