Grosse Pointe Theatre Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 381794060
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Grosse Pointe, MI, USA
- Phone
- 3138814004
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Theater
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $786,724
- Expenses
- $699,055
- Assets
- $1,152,057
- Liabilities
- $68,365
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIELLE CARALIS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DON BISCHOFF (DIRECTOR)
- STEPHANIE BUTLER (DIRECTOR)
- DANIELLE CARALIS (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission to connect, create and inspire communities through theatre is why we exist as an organization. Our vision to become recognized as a national community theatre leader, is what we want to become.
What it reported doing in 2024
(continued) grosse pointe theatres most significant 2025 accomplishment was to complete its year on a profitable basis operationally. The year had many challenges in several ways. Scheduling of shows was not under the theatres control which meant that available performance venues were not necessarily ideal to gpts normal show timing. This did impact ticket sales and made it harder to achieve ticket sales goals. Gpt also continually strives to introduce newer shows which will appeal to a younger audience, but may not have the same familiarity with long time patrons. This does present a conflict from both casting a show and then selling a show. The younger audiences and actors often prefer newer material, while the long-time patrons are more often interested in the name recognition of shows. The theatre is always striving to seek a balance in its offerings, knowing that it needs to satisfy both groups. In order to increase ticket sales for week night performances which are traditionally not as well attended as weekend performances, gpt offered a broader variety of ticket price levels which proved popular. On the expense side, effective cost management controls and policies are rigorously followed in all areas. The board of directors actively review the show budgets and monthly operational statements. Variances are addressed on an ongoing basis and, fiscal year end projections are prepared during the final five months of the year. In summary, gpts most significant achievement was to reach modest operational profitability for the year. A second major accomplishment has been the drive to diversify the organizations revenue streams in order to support profitability. The board of directors works tirelessly in this regard. Contribution revenue from a variety of sources such as foundations, grants, annual fund campaigns and solicited sponsorships are sought. These funds are expected to grow as cultivation efforts become more frequent and sophisticated. Additionally, board members have committed significant personal funds as part of their fiduciary responsibility to gpt. For the past two years, contributions and grants have increased by 25% and 20% respectively, with the largest increase coming from family foundation and grant income. The third major accomplishment has been with the youth education program. An expanded curriculum of classes combined with two production/performance classes area are offered annually. However, the demand for this type of arts education is far greater than the supply of classes. In order to address this growth issue, gpt introduced a new registration system for enrollment which involved a lottery method. This ensures that all students receive equal access to their desired classes. Other youth classes are offered as well, which does provide options and ongoing access to theatre education. Gpt continues to assess this situation and wants to provide more educational opportunities for children and youth, without sacrificing the quality of its programs. Investing in the youth program is seen as a pipeline to develop the talents and skills of future gpt members. The youth programs are a significant source of revenue for the gpt so their success is vital to the whole organizations success. Lastly, from a statement of financial position perspective, gpt has modest long-term debt obligations, (one lease copier), is committed to building its endowment fund and sustainability, and, continues to generate a strong cashflow. The 13th consecutive unqualified audit was just approved by the bod.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.9%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 60.5%; rating input score 61
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.1%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.65; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.9% of revenue deployed · 60.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $423K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.