Grit 920 Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 882195149
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Green Bay, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9202277891
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $150,454
- Expenses
- $166,270
- Assets
- $194,490
- Liabilities
- $5,750
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HOLLIE LINDER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- BRIAN MORK (VICE PRESIDENT - OUTGOING)
- MICHAEL SCHMIDT (PRESIDENT)
- MATTHEW VANGREEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- AMANDA JOHNSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- KAITLYN DRISCOLL (TREASURER)
- HOLLIE LINDER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- BRIAN MORK (VICE PRESIDENT - OUTGOING)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o
What it reported doing in 2025
Expanded partnerships and visibility within the community including green bay packers who provided an adaptive football camp, bay nordic ski to provide an adaptive ski event
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.4%; rating input score 41
- Program expense ratio: 37.4%; rating input score 37
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.5%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.17; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 33.5%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 93.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 37.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 45.7% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41.4% of revenue deployed · 37.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $62K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.