Griggs County Nursing Home
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900741090
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Cooperstown, ND, USA
- Phone
- 7017861700
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,422,999
- Expenses
- $5,309,492
- Assets
- $13,115,877
- Liabilities
- $10,111,285
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Daniel Larson (President)
- Joann Larson (Vice President)
- Nicole Lindsey (CEO/Administrator)
Highest reported compensation
- Nicole Lindsey (CEO/Administrator): $243,096 total reported compensation
- Oreana Wilson (CNA): $112,760 total reported compensation
- Judy Monson (CFO): $48,230 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide 24 hour skilled nursing care services for individuals with degenerative conditions, dementia, and a variety of medically complex conditions.
What it reported doing in 2024
Griggs County Care Center is licensed as a 40-bed skilled nursing facility. The Facility provides 24 hour care for individuals with degenerative conditions, dementia, and a variety of medically complex conditions. Residents are cared for by a highly trained and skilled staff of professionals, who are, for the most part their friends, neighbors, or family members. Nursing home care is available for long-term care stays, convalescent care, and short-term stays. Emphasis is placed on a resident's remaining skills, not on lost skills. Residents are allowed to retain their independence and dignity with assistance to succeed in daily tasks. The nursing home had 14,339 bed days of service for individuals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 94% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.5%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.1%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.47; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.77; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.6%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.7% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.5% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $243K · 9 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $495K reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.