Gresham-mt Hood Jazz Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 753066447
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Gresham, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5036216316
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Music Groups, Bands, Ensembles
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $204
- Expenses
- $100
- Assets
- $169
- Liabilities
- $1,100
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUSIE JONES (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SUSIE JONES (PRESIDENT)
- SUE O'HALLORAN (VICE PRESIDE)
- JANINE ROSS (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote jazz as an american art form.
What it reported doing in 2016
In-kind contributions were received by organization for fundraising events, professional services, and other items for a combined fair market value total in the amount of 1,925
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.2%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 80%; rating input score 80
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 51%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.69; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 6.51; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.2% of revenue deployed · 80% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $80 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.