Gresham Barlow Youth Baseball/softball

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237315297
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Gresham, OR, USA
Phone
5036631962
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$104,302
Expenses
$97,828
Assets
$117,815

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TAYLOR MARGUTH (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TAYLOR MARGUTH (PRESIDENT)
  • TAYLOR MARGUTH (UNIFORMS)
  • MIKE BEGGS (COACHING COO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide baseball and softball training for youths ages 5-18. Over 50 teams competed during the regular season on nine fields. Which were maintained by league of many volunteers. Numerous players ages nine and above were also given the opportunity to play on post all-star and honors tournament teams. The objective of gbyb/s shall be to implant firmly in the children of this community the ideals of good sportsmanship, honesty, loyalty, courage, and respect for authority so that they may be well adjusted, stronger, and happier children and will grow to be good, healthy and trustworthy citizens.

What it reported doing in 2014

Baseball and softball training for youths

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54.4%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 58%; rating input score 58

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.2%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54.4% of revenue deployed · 58% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $57K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.