Grenville Baker Boys and Girls Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
111660855
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Locust Valley, NY, USA
Phone
5167595437
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Boys and Girls Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,750,618
Expenses
$4,599,495
Assets
$28,090,043
Liabilities
$186,572

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIC BROOK (PRESIDENT)
  • ARNE ARNESEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JAMES WIDYN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CAROLE BATES (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MELISSA RHODES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MELISSA RHODES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $227,825 total reported compensation
  • KELLY WALLES (DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT): $138,307 total reported compensation
  • MARC BILBREY (ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR): $131,072 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See schedule oto inspire and enable all young people to realize their potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens and community leaders of tomorrow. The club has been at the forefront of youth development, working with young people of all economic, social and family circumstances but especially those who come from disadvantaged backgrounds. The club has actively sought to enrich the lives of girls and boys whom other youth agencies have had difficulty reaching.

What it reported doing in 2025

Teens and tweens: grades 6-8 - for middle schoolers or "tweens," our club provides a safe space to gather with friends, have fun, explore interests, and succeed academically. Middle schoolers have time to complete their homework, explore elective subjects through our arts and science offerings, and participate in sports and games. Tweens also have a chance to become involved in community service through our torch club to introduce young people to the inherent rewards of community service. Tweens have the opportunity to participate in smart girls or passport to manhood which helps them build up positive self-esteem, body image, and a sense of personal identity and responsibility. (continued on schedule o)grades 9-12 - at grenville baker boys & girls club, we offer teens in grades 9-12 a holistic, positive, and practical approach to preparing for a college education and a productive and fulfilling future. Of note, many of the young people in our teen programs come from homes where english is not the primary language spoken and where they will be the first in their family to attend college. As such, our efforts focus on helping teens prepare academically for high school graduation and college entrance exams, and by exposing them to enriching cultural, leadership, and special interest experiences that will help guide them as they consider their futures.our expected outcome is for all our teens to be on track to graduate from high school on time and to go on to college. We encourage this outcome through a number of programmatic initiatives. For example, through "project learn and stem programs, on a daily basis, our teens participate in high-yield learning activities, reinforcing their reading and math skills and focusing on their ability to analyze data, think critically and solve problems. Our staff works with our teens to strengthen their english and essay writing skills as part of the college prep program. Teens also receive technology training to strengthen their research skills needed for college searches and projects for school. The financial literacy needed for college is provided through a comprehensive program called money matters for both teens. And our keystone club provides opportunities for our teens to build their leadership and personal skills and to give back to their community while building their resumes and their confidence.to help them envision their futures and find the right fit, our teens visit universities and colleges in the tri-state area on days off from school, as well as through multi-day and night college tours to visit schools during school breaks. For our high school seniors, one-on-one assistance is provided to complete applications for admissions, scholarships, and financial aid.we also encourage teens to broaden their horizons through cultural and new experiences. In the past, this has come in the form of our "city club," which took kids to various cultural venues in New York city. The success of our program relies on the strength of the mentoring relationships developed by our staff. The club also offers programs in performing and visual arts to foster creative expression.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.4%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 76.2%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.23 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.11; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.6%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.4% of revenue deployed · 76.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $228K · 27 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 5/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.