Greenwood Heritage Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 571028929
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Greenwood, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8642277160
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Private Grantmaking Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $407,840
- Expenses
- $52,839
- Assets
- $6,065,061
- Liabilities
- $2,937,819
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MR DAVID B BUCKSHORN (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MR DAVID B BUCKSHORN (PRESIDENT/CEO): $649,721 total reported compensation
- MS SUSAN CRIBBS (CFO): $409,492 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To receive, hold, manage, invest or arrange for investing, and to acquire by gift, devise, bequest, purchase, or otherwise and use property of any kind and funds exclusively for the benefit of wesley commons, a section 501(c)(3) organization, its programs, missions, real property, improvements, buildings, fixtures, and the maintenance, preservation, and improvement of the same.
What it reported doing in 2024
Expenses incurred for the benefit of wesley commons, the charitable organization supported by the foundation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Affiliate network. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending through affiliated organizations.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - Most voting board members are independent and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 43.6%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 87%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 114.78; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.48; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 300%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.8% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 43.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $53K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $650K · 7 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.