Greenwich Hospital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 060646659
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Greenwich, CT, USA
- Phone
- 2036882603
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $591,780,458
- Expenses
- $569,127,578
- Assets
- $909,991,822
- Liabilities
- $156,822,474
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
36 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DIANE KELLY (PRESIDENT/TRUSTEE (CURRENT))
- DIANE KELLY (PRESIDENT/TRUSTEE (DEFERRED))
- ROBERT BLENDERMAN (PRESIDENT/TRUSTEE)
Highest reported compensation
- PAMELA SUTTON-WALLACE (TRUSTEE): $3,144,397 total reported compensation
- DIANE KELLY (PRESIDENT/TRUSTEE (CURRENT)): $1,705,516 total reported compensation
- FRANCISCO GARRIDO (ED PHYSICIAN): $854,852 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide healthcare services.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule o
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 63
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.1%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 88%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.14 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 46.4%; rating input score 46; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.8%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.6; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.6%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.1% of revenue deployed · 88% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 24 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $500.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3.1M · 36 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $12.4M reported
- Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 13 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 40 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.