Greenville Theatre
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 576001352
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Greenville, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8642336238
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Theater
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,830,442
- Expenses
- $2,065,414
- Assets
- $1,294,454
- Liabilities
- $935,002
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- MAX QUINLAN (EXEC ARTISTI): $100,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To be a significant regional theatre and a leading arts institution which enhances the cultural landscape of upstate sc; to create a unique theatrical experience that ignites the imagination, lifts the spirits, and informs the patron of the human condition; to serve as a training ground and showplace for the many talented theatre artists of the area; to provide the highest possible quality theatre to the citizens of the upstate by breathing new life into the production of classis plays and musicals; to bring the excitement of live theatre to school children across the upstate. To entertain....to celebrate...and to educate
What it reported doing in 2023
The main stage season consists of a six show subscription series. These fully staged, professionally produced productions of traditional theatre provide a high-quality theatre experience for both participants and audiences. Several hundred communit members participate in these productions providing opportunities for local theatre artists - most of whom are not professional actors - that otherwise would not be abailable in the area. Thousands of local residents attending our mainstage shows each season experience near professional quality productions close to home at a reasonable cost. Greenville little theatre strives to provide a complete theatre experience for the community including professional playbill and background information about the author, the play, and the participants. A typical season usually presents at lease one major musical, a comedy, a classic play, a mystery and a christmas show.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 68% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 58.1%; rating input score 58
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.8%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.72; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.8%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66% of revenue deployed · 58.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $100K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.