Greenville Jazz Collective
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462314359
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Greenville, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8642321231
- Rating
- 93
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Music
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $111,660
- Expenses
- $126,119
- Assets
- $901
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MATT DINGLEDINE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MATT DINGLEDINE (PRESIDENT)
- BOB MULLER (TREASURER)
- DON WESTCOTT (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The greenville jazz collective exists to preserve and promote jazz in the upstate of South Carolina. We steward this important american art form through the promotion of live performance and through educational events and programs to nurture and inspire generations of jazz musicians and appreciators.
What it reported doing in 2024
Formation of youth jazz ensemble - as a group of young aspiring jazz musicians, the youth jazz ensemble had 24 middle and high school-aged participants for the tax year 2024. The summer jazz camp hosted by furman university had 51 weeklong campers. The jazzed ensemble performed 8 school visits reaching 2,500 students. Performances during the year both raised funds for the greenville jazz collective's programs and increased awareness of jazz in the greenville area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 14
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 89.9%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.9%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.5% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $113K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.