Greensprings Learning Community

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452586013
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Ashland, OR, USA
Phone
8008016739
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Higher Education Institutions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,000
Expenses
$5,090
Assets
$1,838
Liabilities
$28,646

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATHLEEN CRAWFORD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KATHLEEN CRAWFORD (PRESIDENT)
  • GARY ERICKSON (TREASURER)
  • KELTON COBB (SECRETARY, HEAD OF SCHOOL)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Greensprings learning community (glc) serves as the non-profit corporate sponsor of the Oregon extension (oe), an undergraduate college program in southern Oregon. Oregon offering a 17 credit semester of coursework that is accredited through a formal relationship with eastern mennonite university in harrisonburg, va. The oe draws students from a variety of colleges to study for a semester in a mountain setting where students study intensively in 3-week blocks, with interludes between allowing for immersion experiences of forest fieldwork, backpacking, and an urban plunge.

What it reported doing in 2024

Glc has a single purpose: to oversee the operation of the off-campus college program called "the Oregon extension." this consists primarily of a 16-week fall semester granting full college credit to students enrolled in 15 different colleges and universities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -154.5%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 15.59; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -35.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -30.7% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.