Greensboro Academy Boosters
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203018259
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Greensboro, NC, USA
- Phone
- 3362868408
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $106,472
- Expenses
- $126,638
- Assets
- $129,225
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CAROLINE EACHUS (PRESIDENT)
- TIFFANY TULECK (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CAROLINE EACHUS (PRESIDENT)
- TIFFANY TULECK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MOHAMMED AWARTANI (ASSISTANT TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Greensboro academy boosters mission is to assist the greensboro academy community by fostering an environment conducive to academic excellence, high moral character and parental involvement in order to provide every student with the best possible education
What it reported doing in 2024
Hot lunch program - the greensboro academy boosters bring in local restaurants to serve hot lunches two days of each week. This service is available to all children and serves our free and reduced popuation. A hot meal offered at school for a child once a day may be the only meal some of these children receive and hot meal AIDS in the children's learning ability.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 74% for direct work, and 26% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.3%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 80.8%; rating input score 81
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.9%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.3% of revenue deployed · 80.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $102K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.