Greenleaf Riders Ltd Snowmobile Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391681582
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Greenleaf, WI, USA
Phone
9206645003
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$24,991
Expenses
$30,319
Assets
$85,429

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RYAN LEICK (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RYAN LEICK (PRESIDENT)
  • TOMMY SCHNEIDER (VICE PRESIDE)
  • TRACY LEICK (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the sport of snowmobiling in all its facets, both recreational and competitive, for pleasure, recreation, and other non-profitable purposes. We promote personal contact, commingling, and fellowship among members.

What it reported doing in 2024

We maintain 18 miles of trails in greenleaf and askeaton areas. Our members volunteer their time to obtain access from land owners, preparing the trails by trimming brush & removing hazardous objects. They mark trails with directional and safety signs and remove the signs once the season has concluded. We also have many activities for members to enjoy: adult snowmobile weekend, raffle fundraiser, family & landowner events, golf outing, christmas & packer parties. Our club holds a raffle each year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 64% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 68% for direct work, and 32% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 89.6%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -21.3%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.82; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $27K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.