Greenberry Athletics

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
861708156
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Washougal, WA, USA
Phone
3606067856
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Baseball, Softball

Reported finances

Revenue
$175,647
Expenses
$108,662
Assets
$94,861
Liabilities
$505

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dan Iverson (President)
  • Lila Chambers (Vice-President)

People named in this filing

  • Dan Iverson (President)
  • Lila Chambers (Vice-President)
  • Danielle Neumann (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A. To sponsor, direct, coach, teach and promote youth athletic programs and the game of baseball for youth players at the recreational level of play. B. To encourage and actively promote good sportsmanship, leadership, discipline and respect among team members, parents and coaches. C. The Corporation is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes.

What it reported doing in 2023

As planned, we successfully expanded both the baseball and softball programs this yearto include a total of six (3 in each program) sponsored tournament baseball and softball teams in Clark County, WA. Our elite program offers competitive play at low to no cost to youth in Clark County, regardless of financial need. All six teams are returning for the 2025 season. Additional, we secured two sizable grants that allowed us to invest in a rental facility for long term use.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.9%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 38.1%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 29.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 41% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 82.7% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $109K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.