Greenbelt Land Trust
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943113836
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Corvallis, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5417529609
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Land Resources Conservation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,910,757
- Expenses
- $3,902,929
- Assets
- $34,425,115
- Liabilities
- $1,538,490
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN BLISS (PRESIDENT)
- NICOLE MANESS (VICE PRESIDENT (THROUGH 02/2025))
- KAREN ARABAS (VICE PRESIDENT (STARTING 02/2025))
- JESSICA MCDONALD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JESSICA MCDONALD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $119,658 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Conserving land and water in the willamette valley for a more resilient future.
What it reported doing in 2024
Land conservation:- protected 430 acres of oak and prairie habitat for permanent protection- led an udpate of glt's conservation plan- connected with interested landowners across the willamette valley to collaborate on achieving mutual goals of permanent conservation for fish, wildlife and resilient habitats, with a focus on drinking water source protection, water quality and air quality for future generations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 60% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.8%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 82.1%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.5%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.82; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.1%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.8% of revenue deployed · 82.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $120K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.