Green Space Romeo
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 331951956
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Romeo, MI, USA
- Phone
- 2487361649
- Rating
- 37
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Botanical Gardens, Arboreta and Botanical Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $280
- Expenses
- $5
- Assets
- $275
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
People named in this filing
- Donna Folland (Chair)
- Kimberley Voss (Vice Chair)
- Kristin Brewer (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of Green Space Romeo is to increase access to public green space for the benefit of all community members and to promote and support green spaces for health and wellness benefits, educational opportunities and improvement to the environment and the quality of life. Our activities include advocacy and fundraising for local public green spaces and parks, volunteer workdays to manage and improve green space, partnership with professionals in the nonprofit, government and private sectors to ensure best practices and regulatory compliance, and partnership with schools to promote outdoor learning experiences.
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025, Green Space Romeo attempted to acquire a 5-acre property. We made an offer on the property based on pledges (to Four County Community Foundation) and a bank loan. The offer was turned down by the landowner, and no pledges were fulfilled. Green Space Romeo has adjusted its purpose to focus on stewardship, restoration and education, instead of land acquisition.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 90
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 98.2%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 55; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.