Green Power 4 All Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922394156
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Show Low, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 8007900706
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Energy Resources Conservation and Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $47,365
- Expenses
- $89,752
- Assets
- $1,019,015
- Liabilities
- $75,339
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Regina Larsen (President)
- Noemi Hernandez (Vice President)
- Melissa Harkiewicz (CEO)
People named in this filing
- Regina Larsen (President)
- Corina Cane (Secretary)
- Noemi Hernandez (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
At GP4A, our mission is to empower communities with affordable, innovative clean energy solutions. We are committed to reducing environmental impact and democratizing access to technologies that foster a sustainable and equitable future. Through our initiatives, we aim to:- Promote Energy Independence: Increase adoption of solar power, wind energy, and other renewable sources to reduce reliance on fossil fuels.- Expand Electric Vehicle Infrastructure: Enhance accessibility to EV charging facilities to support the transition to cleaner transportation.- Educate and Empower: Provide educational programs that raise awareness and understanding of sustainable practices.
What it reported doing in 2024
We collaborate with a diverse range of stakeholdersincluding local governments, businesses, educational institutions, and community organizationsto drive impactful change. Our partnerships are crucial in amplifying our reach and enhancing the effectiveness of our initiatives. Together, we work towards:- Advancing Policy and Regulation: Influence policy and regulatory frameworks that support sustainable development.- Driving Community Engagement: Engage communities directly to ensure that our projects meet their needs and have lasting positive effects.- Supporting Workforce Development: Prepare the workforce for the future by training individuals in renewable energy technologies and sustainable practices.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 28
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 37.9%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 20%; rating input score 20
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -89.5%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.35; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 37.9% of revenue deployed · 20% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.