Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521786577
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Baltimore, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4105346447
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,194,670
- Expenses
- $17,630,687
- Assets
- $10,914,297
- Liabilities
- $3,958,928
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RUTH ANN NORTON (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- RUTH ANN NORTON (PRESIDENT & CEO): $409,600 total reported compensation
- MICHAEL MCKNIGHT (SR. VP OF NATIONAL PROGRAM): $206,845 total reported compensation
- BERTRAND COOPER (VP OF STATE AND LOCAL STRATEGIC SERVIC): $206,576 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The green & healthy homes initiative is dedicated to addressing the social determinants of health, opportunity and equity through the creation of healthy, safe and energy efficient homes.
What it reported doing in 2024
Policy and innovation: ghhi works to advance polices and implement models to support sustainable resources for healthy housing, including developing and assessing new funding pathways, partnerships with sectors such as healthcare, and making the business case for investing in healthy housing and increasing local capacity. Ghhi provides technical assistance to asthma, household injury and other health prevention projects around the country, conducting data analysis and designing partnerships between housing and healthcare that can result in sustainable healthcare funded preventive programs. In 2024, ghhi continued its work on the $4.75 million New York healthy homes collaborative outcomes-based, asthma prevention financing project with affinity by molina that ghhi helped develop, has provided preventive services to 303 molina members with asthma to date. In North Carolina, ghhi produced the final report for blue cross blue shield of nc on the innovative fall prevention pilot ($1.3 million) that served 461 members. Blue cross blue shield will be analyzing the roi of the project in 2025. Ghhi continues to be the technical assistance provider for the $20 million detroit home repair fund, which utilizes eleven local community development organizations to provide critical repairs for over 300 detroit families. Ghhi also began an innovative project for a subset of detroit home repair fund homes, incorporating an assessment for electrification readiness in terms of home condition and resident interest. The project is funded by the national science foundation, in partnership with pecan street and the university of Michigan. In Ohio, ghhi completed its two years of work as the evaluator and technical assistance provider for the state health department's asthma program. Climate, energy and community resilience: the climate, energy and community resilience department is committed to direct services, research, advocacy, dissemination of best practices and technical and strategic guidance and partnerships that reduce greenhouse gas emissions through increased residential energy efficiency, electrification and decarbonization, and improved housing conditions. The department advances coordinated approaches to healthy, energy efficient, decarbonized, and affordable housing at the federal, state and local level by promoting interagency coordination and increased support for electrification. Through community level engagement, technical assistance services, and national policy leadership and advocacy, the department also seeks to achieve the adoption of electrification as a health and climate-based housing standard. In 2024, ghhi advocated for the adoption of zero emissions heating equipment standards (zehes) in Maryland and other state level advancement of policies for comprehensive healthy homes and energy efficiency upgrades, including the alignment of climate, health and housing sectors.data evaluation & data management: the data, evaluation and learning department uses data to learn, iterate and improve programming and services across all facets of ghhi and the broader healthy homes community. The department curates engagements with stakeholders around the country about the importance of data in our larger effort to create healthier homes and provides data on the return on investment for private and public stakeholder investments which ultimately result in healthier families. The data & evaluation team has worked with projects and organizations across the country to design evaluation plans and build custom data management systems to ensure the efficacy of programing and services. Access to real time data on activities, outputs and outcomes has allowed projects and organizations to operate with more efficiency while also creating pathways to learn and pivot on programmatic approach; thus, creating increased opportunities for successful outcomes and lasting impact for families and individuals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.9%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 87.7%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.7%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.5%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.9% of revenue deployed · 87.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $15.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $410K · 14 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.5M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.