Green Generations
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453412916
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Bedford Hills, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5167547822
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $130,940
- Expenses
- $109,446
- Assets
- $52,705
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ADRIENNE HEIM-VENER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- BROOK S JACKSON (BOARD CHAIR)
- ADRIENNE HEIM-VENER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- TIMOTHY RIKER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
For charitable and educational purposes only.
What it reported doing in 2022
Green generations partners with schools in underserved, high-risk communities to offer in-school and after-school programming for children k-12. Programs focus on self esteem and mindfulness education to nurture happy, confident children and empower them to be compassionate leaders of tomorrow.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.2%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 94.8%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.4%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 91.2%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.2% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.2% of revenue deployed · 94.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $104K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.