Green Beret Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271206961
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- Southern Pines, NC, USA
- Phone
- 8442877133
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,695,680
- Expenses
- $3,872,540
- Assets
- $5,899,138
- Liabilities
- $350,946
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHARLES P IACONO (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CHARLES P IACONO (PRESIDENT & CEO): $340,408 total reported compensation
- ANNA L RICHARDSON (FOUNDATION RELATIONS & SCHOLARSHIPS DIRECTOR): $123,664 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide financial assistance, support, and liaising for the wounded, ill, injured and the family members (including killed in action) of the special forces regiment (green berets) when the care system does not cover the need directly related to the health and welfare of that service member or their family.
What it reported doing in 2024
Family support: the family of a special forces soldier is their first and most important support, and so it's critical that the green beret foundation provides trust, strength, and services to meet the needs of the entire family. The family support programs include scholarships, health and wellness programs, and access to our very own steel mags sisterhood program. These programs provide direct assistance for the spouses and children of special forces soldiers as they navigate the challenges of training, deployments, and life after the military that are not available by other means. These programs include: support and financial assistance to the spouses who must become a caregiver to a special forces soldier. This situation can affect them emotionally, physically, and can often seem overwhelming. We help them make sure they are taking care of themselves throughout the caregiving process. Financial support, care, and education for special forces parents with special-needs children. Healthcare and financial support for spouses and children suffering from conditions not covered by the dod/va, including cancer, medical devices, childcare, therapies and retreats, and meal trains. The de oppresso liber (dol) scholarship program, for qualified children of special forces soldiers. Dol1 scholarships are for children of non-commissioned officers, dol2 scholarships are for the children of warrant officers, and dol3 scholarships are for the children of commissioned officers. The athena scholarship program is for special forces spouses pursuing their undergraduate and graduate degrees. The athena grant provides special forces spouses financial support to cover the costs of vocational programs, exams, and professional development courses. The steel mags sisterhood program is exclusive to the green beret foundation. It provides spouses, parents, siblings, and caregivers of special forces soldiers. They receive unconditional support, strength, advocacy, and direction on how to access critical resources that empower them to build a life where they can thrive for themselves and their family. Financial support for monthly living expenses due to extenuating circumstances.gold star & surviving families support: our gold star family program begins in the immediate wake of a combat death, assisting with a wide variety of needs to support the family during the dignified transfer, memorial service, and funeral. Our sacred duty and privilege at the green beret foundation is to serve the families and loved ones who lost a special forces soldier. The final sacrifice of a fallen special forces soldier causes us to pause, reflect, and give thanks for the freedoms we hold so dear. For this reason, our gold star program remains a critical focus of our mission. Not every loss of a green beret is combat related. Our surviving family support often begins before the green beret passes due to injury in training, illness, or suicide. With sudden non-combat related deaths, we can react quickly and provide seamless support.this program includes: possible assistance of funeral costs not covered by the military and continuous engagement with families to support the healing of the green beret's immediate family through therapies, activities, and networking.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 59% for direct work, and 41% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.1%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 84.1%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.5%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.52; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.1% of revenue deployed · 84.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $340K · 12 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $163K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.