Greater Topeka Partnership Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

37 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

To be the catalyst for economic prosperity within our community.

Revenue model: Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: 98.7%; rating input score 99; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Operating margin: -18.6%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 14.1%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 29 of 29 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
Leadership: top reported pay $434K · 37 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
Related organizations: 16 filed related-organization links
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.