Greater Tampa Junior Golf Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 591788848
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Tampa, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8133351233
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $38,072
- Expenses
- $40,723
- Assets
- $6,800
- Liabilities
- $2,814
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES KYLE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JAMES KYLE (PRESIDENT)
- CRAIG HARTER (TREASURER)
- PENNY M GALLAGLY (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote junior golf in a professional manner, allowing personal and professional growth for all juniors between the ages of six and eighteen.
What it reported doing in 2018
Administration of ten to twelve golf tournaments each year, open to all youths between the ages of six and eighteen.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 63.4%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $41K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2009 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.