Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251420599
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Duquesne, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4124603663
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Food Banks, Pantries
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $94,533,291
- Expenses
- $95,217,205
- Assets
- $60,767,863
- Liabilities
- $7,847,047
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
33 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LISA SCALES (PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- LISA SCALES (PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $390,479 total reported compensation
- GARY DOYLE (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $204,271 total reported compensation
- CHARLA IRWIN-BUNCHER (CHIEF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS OFFICER): $193,944 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to leverage the power of community to achieve lasting solutions to hunger and its root causes.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community outreach and education - greater pittsburgh community food bank seeks to engage our community in our mission and mobilize our collective resources to fight food insecurity and it's root causes. Key community outreach and education programs include:-advocacy: the food bank plays an important role in supporting government funded food assistance programs and urging elected officials to support and prioritize them. The government affairs team cultivates non-partisan relationship with our elected officials, educating them about the importance of food security, and encouraging food bank stakeholders to advocate for government funded food assistance programs.-community outreach and education: the food bank's community outreach and education team's goal is to utilize staff, board members, and volunteers to engage members of community groups, schools, universities, congregations, businesses and other affiliations in activities that raise awareness about the food bank's mission to leverage the power of community to achieve lasting solutions to hunger and its root causes.-volunteer program: volunteers are at the heart of our mission to leverage the power of community. From sorting food and building healthy food boxes for seniors to harvesting fresh produce from farms, the food bank thrives on the help of individuals, social groups, corporations and organizations of all types. In fiscal year 2025, nearly 8,900 volunteers donated over 78,800 hours to serve our neighbors in a safe work environment.-marketing and communications: by utilizing multiple media platforms and strategies, the food bank has created incredible visibility and brand awareness, educating those in need of food assistance to the resources available and helping secure donations and volunteers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.8%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 92.6%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $24.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 95%; rating input score 95; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 88.5%; rating input score 89; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.7%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 93.8% of revenue deployed · 92.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $88.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $390K · 33 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
- Consistency: 44 of 45 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.