Greater Pittsburgh Arts Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251737717
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4123912060
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,120,324
- Expenses
- $1,681,992
- Assets
- $527,437
- Liabilities
- $25,526
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FISHER PATRICK (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- FISHER PATRICK (CEO): $135,523 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
By sharing resources and fostering meaningful relationships that strengthen the region's creative community, the greater pittsburgh arts council builds a more resourced, connected, and informed arts sector, empowering artists and arts organizations (see sch o) throughout southwestern Pennsylvania.
What it reported doing in 2024
In fy25, the greater pittsburgh arts council advanced its mission to support and uplift the region's arts community through strategic investments in grants, advocacy, community engagement, and promotional initiatives that strengthened the creative sector across southwestern Pennsylvania.grantmakingthe arts council awarded $779,500 in grants in fy25, directly benefiting 36 arts organizations and 207 individuals across southwestern Pennsylvania. See sch othe arts council distributed $354,000 in one-time grants to artists who experienced income loss due to the covid-19 pandemic. These funds, provided by the Pennsylvania department of community and economic development, were part of the state's pandemic relief efforts. Through the Pennsylvania council on the arts' creative sector flex fund program, the arts council distributed $180,000 in grants to local arts organizations. An additional $88,000 supported creative entrepreneurs through the pca's creative entrepreneur accelerator program.the arts council also awarded $7,500 in grants to black artists through the black artist empowerment grant and partnered with program to aid citizen enterprise to distribute $150,000 in grants to artists representing the global majority.advocacya strong commitment to arts advocacy defined fy25 for the arts council. This year, the arts council launched an advocacy tour to engage philanthropic leaders and elected officials in their home districts, guiding them on a trolley tour of local arts organizations to showcase tangible examples of public dollars at work and how these investments leverage private funding to strengthen the creative sector.in addition to these outreach efforts, the arts council has worked closely with the city of pittsburgh and allegheny county governments to ensure that culture is central to their comprehensive planning processes. These efforts include supporting the county in pursuing a standalone cultural plan to strategically guide investment and policy in the arts.recognizing the impact of national policy on the local arts ecosystem, the arts council has also tracked changes resulting from federal priorities and executive orders under the current administration, helping local artists and organizations navigate evolving regulations and funding landscapes.engagementbetween july 1, 2024, and june 30, 2025, the arts council conducted 118 engagements, totaling 151 work hours and reaching 67 individuals and 51 organizations. These interactions included 89 one-on-one support meetings, 16 site visits, 6 external presentations, and 7 convening events, all designed to strengthen and connect the region's arts community.in addition, the arts council hosted 10 creative hive networking events, attracting 694 attendees within the creative sector, fostering collaboration and knowledge-sharing across southwestern Pennsylvania.marketing and communicationsthrough its digital platforms, the arts council actively promoted the work of artists and arts organizations in fy25. During this period, the arts council highlighted 3,083 arts events across 52 weekly event roundup posts, and 846 job opportunities were shared through 12 dedicated job roundup posts.these efforts reflect the arts council's ongoing commitment to championing the arts as a vital driver of economic, cultural, and social growth in southwestern Pennsylvania, while connecting artists, organizations, and the broader community to meaningful opportunities and resources.the arts council also made investments in new technologies to help expand our reach and breadth as an information hub.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 62% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 75.5%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -50.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.1%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 75.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $136K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.