Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860046963
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6024952195
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,450,740
- Expenses
- $3,454,732
- Assets
- $3,674,929
- Liabilities
- $2,349,655
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
49 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TODD SANDERS (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- TODD SANDERS (PRESIDENT & CEO): $449,111 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER MELLOR (CHIEF INNOVATION OFFICER): $218,703 total reported compensation
- MICHAEL HUCKINS (SR. VP OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS & IT OP.): $161,322 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Greater phoenix chamber of commerce (the chamber) catalyzes regional prosperity with forward-thinking public policy, intentional economic growth, and diverse, prepared talent.
What it reported doing in 2024
Representing 2,400 businesses across the greater phoenix region, the chamber is the largest and most influential business network in the state of Arizona. The chamber catalyzes regional prosperity with forward-thinking public policy, intentional economic growth, and diverse, prepared talent. Our members are committed to building a vibrant business community and benefit from the countless connections and opportunities being a chamber member provides. In fiscal year 2025, an estimated 770,000 employees of member companies were served by the chamber. Additionally, the chamber is the leading voice of business at the state capitol and city hall. Member driven priorities guide our advocacy efforts, ensuring that the best interests of our member companies are always at the forefront. There were 300 engaged employers within 35+ public affairs and issue committee meetings working with the chamber's public policy team advocating for Arizona businesses. With guidance from members, the chamber supported 24 bills that were signed into law and opposed 33 bills that were defeated. This year's legislative successes include big wins for numerous issues including continuing public safety investments within maricopa county, ensuring economic drivers such as chase field in downtown phoenix are maintained, stopping business mandates, and strengthening our higher education workforce partners. The chamber also connects member employees with other professionals, elected officials, critical information, and opportunities. The chamber continuously works to build connections and expand networks, so that businesses in Arizona may continue to strive.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.1%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.64; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25.7%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 36 of 36 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $449K · 49 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $526K reported
- Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.