Greater Nashua Habitat for Humanity

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
020459739
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Hollis, NH, USA
Phone
6038830295
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$91,843
Expenses
$264,462
Assets
$1,377,166
Liabilities
$39,531

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRISTA TSECHRINTZIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • JENNIFER ANNAND (PRESIDENT)
  • STEPHANIE KANE (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHRISTA TSECHRINTZIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $93,074 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To create decent, afffordable housing for people in need, and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience with people everywhere.

What it reported doing in 2024

Habitat for humanity international, inc. Hfhi has a suggested 10 tithing based on the internal calculations for unrestricted funds which is used for their worldwide housing programs 22,800. In addition, hfhi has adopted the u.s. Stewardship and organization sustainability initiative us-soi. The policy requires affiliates to pay an annual fee which is determined by population within the approved geographic service area of the affiliate. The purpose is to generate a revenue stream for hfhi to help offset a portion of the operational costs used to assist u.s. Affiliates and to leverage the strength of the funds for the benefit of all .

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 41% for direct work, and 59% for affiliated organizations.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 16
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 11.6%; rating input score 12
  • Program expense ratio: 14.7%; rating input score 15
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -188%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.21; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 35.2%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -19% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -8.2% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 11.6% of revenue deployed · 14.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $39K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $93K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 12/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 15/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.