Greater Napa Fair Housing Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 421576121
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Napa, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7072536108
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $612,191
- Expenses
- $603,556
- Assets
- $295,833
- Liabilities
- $122,395
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PABLO ZATARAIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (THRU 02/24/25))
Highest reported compensation
- PABLO ZATARAIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (THRU 02/24/25)): $107,407 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Assist renters in gaining access to fair housing. Prevent discrimination by landlords and inform renters of their rights under the law.
What it reported doing in 2024
Assist renters in obtaining fair access to housing. Fair housing napa valley's primary programs include fair housing enforcement and investigation, landlord/tenant counseling and mediation, education and outreach, disaster- related housing counseling, and related assistance to mobile home parks.all agency programs are available to clients free of charge, and are available to persons of all income levels. Unlike some legal aid organizations, we do not limit our services to citizens or legal residents. All persons will receive assistance regardless of their immigration status. All programs are available in person in english and spanish, and interpretive services are available for other languages. See scheule ospecial accommodations are available for mobility, visual or hearing impairments.fair housing napa valley's mission is to develop and promote equal access to housing choices for all residents. As part of these efforts, fhnv regularly works with housing providers property owners, hoas, property managers and management companies, and developers to ensure that they understand and are in compliance with fair housing and law. All services are confidential and free of charge. Services for housing providers include: information regarding obligations and rights under fair housing laws; counseling and investigation of inquiries/ complaints; review of existing rental practices, policies, and rules to ensure compliance with the law; and fair housing workshops for jurisdiction staff. Fair housing napa valley also offers all of its programs to residents and management staff of napa county's dozens of mobile home parks.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 95% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.2%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 79.3%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $21.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.4%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.8%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.2% of revenue deployed · 79.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $479K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $107K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.