Greater Minneapolis Crisis Nursery

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411379021
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Phone
7635910400
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Foster Care

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,411,635
Expenses
$5,308,528
Assets
$2,738,402
Liabilities
$321,365

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

26 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARY PAT LEE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARY PAT LEE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $191,793 total reported compensation
  • ANN HAVENS-SMITH (FINANCE & OPERATIONS DIRECTOR): $190,617 total reported compensation
  • LAURA WAGNER (DEVELOPMENT & COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR): $143,336 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of greater minneapolis crisis nursery is to end the abuse and neglect of children and create strong and healthy families.

What it reported doing in 2024

The mission of greater minneapolis crisis nursery is to end child abuse and neglect and create strong, healthy families. A trusted resource for parents to call in their time of crisis, the nursery is open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year, offering free services for families in need. Services include a 24-hour crisis line, crisis de-escalation services, community referrals, a home visiting program, and a residential nursery where parents may voluntarily place their children while they address their crises. Greater minneapolis crisis nursery primarily works with families with low incomes in hennepin county, who have the strength to call us in the midst of their crises. We consider it courageous to ask for help, not a weakness. Many families who use the nursery are experiencing trauma, maternal depression, domestic violence, homelessness, medical or mental health concerns, and isolation primarily resulting from poverty. These situations often place children at a much greater risk of abuse and neglect. The family services program at the nursery responded to 2,096 calls through the crisis line. In an effort to decrease isolation and alleviate the immediate crisis, the nursery provided over 1,034 referrals to connect families with agencies in the community that help to address the unique needs of each family. The nursery's overnight residential care provided 4,420 days/nights of care to 1,733 children in 1,058 families last year. Approximately 65% of our clients are children aged 6 weeks to 6 years. Of the children in our shelter, 11% were reported by their parents/guardians to have experienced victimization, including possible child abuse or neglect, witnessing someone being abused, or witnessing a violent crime (most often witnessing someone being abused). The nursery's home visiting program provided 611 home visits. This program focuses on family stability through goal setting, support, family strengths, and targeted referrals. Among home visiting clients, 46% of parents experienced abuse or neglect as a child, 48% reported mental health concerns, and 67% were survivors of domestic violence.in fy2025, 99% of parents using our services are women. Approximately 93% are people of color or those identifying as native or hispanic, and 53% of families have annual incomes of $10,000 or less. 90% of parents placing their children at the nursery were single parents, and 22% of families were experiencing homelessness. 98% of clients report that the nursery helped to manage their crisis and 98% of parents or guardians reported they felt their children received good care during their stay. This is in part because all our programs 1) use a two-generational approach, 2) promote protective factors which help mitigate family risks and increase health and well-being, and 3) use a trauma-informed approach - the nursery way. Our approach is also strength-based, non-judgmental, relationship-building, and we reduce barriers to access our services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.1%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 74.8%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.53 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -20.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.9%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.1% of revenue deployed · 74.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $192K · 26 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.