Greater Mankato Area United Way Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 416008819
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Mankato, MN, USA
- Phone
- 5073454551
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,008,647
- Expenses
- $3,880,310
- Assets
- $4,671,866
- Liabilities
- $160,771
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
27 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BARBARA KAUS (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- BARBARA KAUS (CEO): $172,969 total reported compensation
- LAURA MURRAY (COO): $105,906 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To unite the community to secure and invest resources to improve people's lives.
What it reported doing in 2025
Grant applications every organization applying for funding from greater mankato area united way (gmauw) must complete an application on an annual basis. The application requires a rigorous reporting process including the actual number of individuals served, the impact and outcomes of funding, and actual financial statements. The applications and budgets are reviewed by teams of volunteers who have been trained by gmauw director of community impact. Program service accomplishments 1 greater mankato area united way's (gmauw) core commitments are to secure resources, convene the community, and connect people and organizations to recourses. Through these actions, gmauw aims to ensure the well-being, stability, and self-sufficiency of individuals of all ages and to build a better tomorrow for all in our region. Gmauw provided funding to 66 programs across 44 nonprofit agencies in 2025. Of these programs, 39 received additional "one-time" funding in the fall of 2025. Gmauw secures resources by soliciting individuals and businesses throughout the region during the annual campaign. In 2025, approximately 5,000 individuals donated through workplace campaigns or other personal giving, while approximately 150 companies pledged a corporate gift. Additionally, more than 1,700 volunteers donated over 16,000 hours of volunteer service enabling gmauw to keep overhead low while maximizing impact. In-kind donations, whose value totaled over 880,000 in 2025, are also essential to ensuring gmauw activities have the maximum impact. Community impact - education gmauw helps to stabilize families in need and gives them tools for success by supporting basic needs, education, and health. The focus area of education is structured to building systems of support for parents and young children to ensure that all children are ready for kindergarten, ensure youth have healthy growth and development opportunities and that youth have access to quality youth development programs that foster positive experiences. These programs served about 19,570 youth in 2025. Examples of other educational initiatives include the united way fourth- grade book project, which served about 1,600 children; "the kindness booth" book project, which served approximately 2,000 children; and the annual reading festival, which served more than 500 children and families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 70% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.6%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 77.4%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.4%; rating input score 99; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.2%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.2%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.6% of revenue deployed · 77.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 25 of 25 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $173K · 27 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 46 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 44 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.