Greater Loudonville Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222309680
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
- Location
- Loudonville, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5189926081
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $27,917
- Expenses
- $27,157
- Assets
- $57,257
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mary Brizzell (President)
- Kevin Bronner Jr (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Mary Brizzell (President)
- Kevin Bronner Jr (Vice President)
- Kristi Dariano (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Monitor/Enhance historic character-Loudonville community; property maintenance of Loudonville Triangle parcel & Loudon Green Park; host free events for Loudonville community
What it reported doing in 2025
5350 property maintenance 3814 communications to Loudonville community & GLA members- Elm Tree Newsletter & other event notices 1072 Les couch award (high school student recognition) 2489 hosting free community events
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 80% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 48
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.2%; rating input score 48
- Program expense ratio: 46.9%; rating input score 47
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.7%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.11; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 75.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 48.2% of revenue deployed · 46.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.