Greater Lee's Summit Healthcare Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431341459
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Kansas City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 8168420944
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $170,247
- Expenses
- $174,260
- Assets
- $3,510,142
- Liabilities
- $500
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
People named in this filing
- JOHN BEAUDOIN (DIRECTOR)
- JON ELLIS (DIRECTOR)
- JEANNE WILLERTH (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary focus of the board has been to help support programs thatsupport the global health in the community in greater lee's summit.grants and scholarships are awarded annually. Scholarships areawarded to the top qualified students from or living in lee's summitthat are pursuing careers in health related occupations and submitthe completed application to the foundation.
What it reported doing in 2025
The greater lee's summit healthcare foundation awarded $100,000 in scholarships for 2025 for students preparing for careers in health care at the following universities and colleges: a.t. Still university, darthmouth college, Iowa state university, Missouri state university, rosalind franklin university of medicine & science, st. Louis university, university of Kansas, university of Kansas medical center, university of Missouri - columbia, university of Missouri - Kansas city, university of Tennessee.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 88.8%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.4%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.14; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $155K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 20 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 50 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.