Greater Kansas City Spinal Cord Injury Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263501086
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Kansas City, MO, USA
- Rating
- 42
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nerve, Muscle and Bone Diseases
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $99,822
- Expenses
- $56,957
- Assets
- $178,412
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Erin Brown (President)
People named in this filing
- Erin Brown (President)
- Scott Mendenhall (Treasurer)
- Joan McMahon (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our purpose is to provide resources services and peer support to individuals with spinal cord injuries disease their families and professionals. The chapter will assist individuals with the unique difficulties encountered when residinding in a bi-state city when searching for information education and assistance. This support is for those Kansas City and the surrounding area.
What it reported doing in 2024
MidWest Ability Summit: This is a convention that we put on annually to provide information to those who attend about services activities sports that are available to people with disabilities. We also provide continuing education for professional.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 6
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 8.6%; rating input score 9
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.9%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.13; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 33.1% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 8.6% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.