Greater Golden Gate Ltl Scholars Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942767731
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Napa, CA, USA
Phone
7072268080
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Football

Reported finances

Revenue
$25,033
Expenses
$24,372
Assets
$3,687
Liabilities
$3,026

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ranon Ross (President)
  • T BOYD (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • Ranon Ross (President)
  • Denise Wallace (Secretary)
  • Bill Bickford (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To coordinate popwarner football activities. Greater golden gate little scholars is an organization of associations to familialize participants with basic of tackle football, cheer, dancing, and inspire youth in sportsmanship.

What it reported doing in 2015

1. Scholastics; we encourage children to excel in academics, and we recognize the achievements of those who have earned an 80% gpa or better. In 2015, we recognized nearly 60 scholars, athletes with certificates. 2. Coach trining; we provide training opportunities to volunteer coaches for football and cheerleading. There are nearly 20 people in this category for each of the 8 associations in our section. 3. National participation; we assist with the expenses to send staff to the national championships in Florida where they provide on-site immediate assistance for the football players and cheerleaders during the week of the championships. Four people from our section participated in 2015 t0 assist nearly 100 children from the associations in our section.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 6
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 8.7%; rating input score 9
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.6%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.82; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 39.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 8.7% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2013 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.