Greater Elizabeth Bible Church
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453330095
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4045050554
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $203,405
- Expenses
- $184,958
- Assets
- $526,646
- Liabilities
- $504,841
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Dr Kenneth Augustus Walker (Pastor/Director): $25,125 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Greater Elizabeth Bible Church is a place of hope, healing, and help where we change lives for Christ one life at a time.
What it reported doing in 2015
1. Provided weekly worship services focused on hope, healing, and help in keeping with the Church's vision statement.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 57
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Limited
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.1%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.85; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.96; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.6%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $25K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.