Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 420540765
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Des Moines, IA, USA
- Phone
- 5153236290
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,844,203
- Expenses
- $5,009,061
- Assets
- $31,369,806
- Liabilities
- $3,948,973
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIMBERLEY PEREZ (PRESIDENT / CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- KIMBERLEY PEREZ (PRESIDENT / CEO): $216,039 total reported compensation
- WHITNEY BOUMA (CHIEF PROGRAMMING OFFICER): $121,518 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Exploring, explaining and celebrating the world of plants.
What it reported doing in 2024
More than sixty years ago, community leaders saw the need for an urban garden in the heart of des moines. After years of persistence, their vision came to life with the opening of the botanical center (as it was then known) in 1979. The original botanical center operated as part of the city of des moines' parks and recreation department, featuring the domed conservatory, a tropical plant collection, and a couple of classrooms. Municipal oversight of the botanical center continued through the early 2010s. At that time, four community leaders-former des moines mayor tom urban, buz brenton, fred weitz, and janis ruan-led the transformation of the botanical center into the greater des moines botanical garden. This transformation included the closure of robert d. Ray drive to allow for the construction of outdoor gardens along the des moines river. The greater des moines botanical garden opened as a private, nonprofit organization in 2013 and continues to thrive through a strong public-private partnership with the city of des moines today.more than 40 years after its original opening, today's greater des moines botanical garden is a vibrant 12-acre public garden-including nearly four acres of free public garden space-situated in the heart of downtown des moines. The mission of the botanical garden is to explore, explain, and celebrate the world of plants. As an influential arts and culture destination, the botanical garden brings together community members, tourists, children, families, horticulturists, and more in a unique environment that promotes education and ecological stewardship. Through the fusion of art, horticulture, and learning, we are uniquely positioned to strengthen connections between plants, people, and the natural world for our community and for visitors from across the state and around the globe.in 2023, the botanical garden celebrated a major milestone: one decade since transitioning to an independent nonprofit. Over that decade, we expanded our physical gardens to 12 beautifully developed acres, grew our plant collections to nearly 3,400 species, increased our workforce to more than 30 employees and 400 volunteers, and built a strong community of members and community partners. Annual attendance includes visitors from all 50 states and more than 25 international locations.in fy2025, the botanical garden continued this positive trajectory, welcoming more than 144,000 visitors throughout the year. Nearly 13,000 individuals received free admission as part of our pineapple program. We engaged thousands of learners through year-round education programs, continued to sell out summer camps, and sustained record-breaking attendance for the new holiday light event, dome for the holidays. Membership remained strong, and the volunteer workforce grew to nearly 650, playing a vital role in operations and community engagement. Additionally, the botanical garden operating the welcome, gather, grow capital campaign, raising generous support from the community to make much-needed improvements to the facility and grounds. Construction began at the end of fy25 with the first of those projects slated to reopen in fy26.the greater des moines botanical garden is more than a dome. It is a connection point between plants, people, and the natural world-a place where anyone can explore, create, connect, and embrace their true nature.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36.8%; rating input score 37
- Program expense ratio: 82.1%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 57.7%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.26; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.7%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 36.8% of revenue deployed · 82.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $216K · 23 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.