Greater Dayton Realtist Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
454181414
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Dayton, OH, USA
Phone
9376070491
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$32,559
Expenses
$40,166
Assets
$44,482

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

People named in this filing

  • VERONICA NEVELS (CHAIRMAN)
  • TRACI MARTIN (SECRETARY)
  • BIANCCA HARVEY (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose is: (1) to promote the general welfare of, and encourage the cooperation among all realtist in the greater dayton area. (2) to create and promote community wellness by facilitating construction, rehabilitation, and improvement of neighborhoods, disseminating information to the neighborhoods concerning housing and community improvment programs, and encourging the participation of residents. (3) to provide financial aid and assistance in relief of poor and underprivileged, underserved, and un-served members of the community to secure housing opportunities.

What it reported doing in 2024

(1) promoteed the general welfare of, and encouraged the cooperation among all realtist in the greater dayton area. (2) created and promoted community wellness by facilitating construction, rehabilitation, and improvement of neighborhoods, disseminating information to the neighborhoods concerning housing and community improvment programs, and encourging the participation of residents.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -23.4%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 24.9% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.