Greater Dallas Barn Hunt

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
331674865
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Plano, TX, USA
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Training, Behavior

Reported finances

Revenue
$51,125
Expenses
$41,585
Assets
$14,540

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Karen (President)
  • Ashley Brezina (Vice-President)

People named in this filing

  • Karen (President)
  • Ashley Brezina (Vice-President)
  • Barbara Morgan (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To host and educate the public about the dog sport of Barn Hunt as sanctioned by the Barn Hunt Association. Our activity furthers our exempt purposes by providing a service to help educate the general public on doing more things with your dog strengthening the bond between handler and canine giving teams the chance to explore a satisfying outlet for happier home life and utilize the skills learned in the sport of Barn Hunt in order to further the advancement of teams wanting to advance into other canine sports. We also teach how to help run a volunteer based activity teach skills on animal care and provide a friendly atmosphere for people to come together with a common interest and good sportsmanship. We also help educate and train current and prospective judges through judge workshops and mentoring at our trials.

What it reported doing in 2025

We hold at least nine trials per year with an average of 70 to 80 dogs and handlers qualifying for levels of proficiency from Instinct to Novice to Open to Senior and finally Master. We also mentor and train new Judges. We mentor and teach new participants in the sport. All trials are open to both the public and members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.1%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.7%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $43K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.