Greater Dallas Asian American Chamber of Commerce Eco Dev & Educ

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 752899257
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2025–2025
Forms available: Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Rating: 62
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Federated Giving Programs

Reported finances

Revenue: $28,244
Expenses: $23,829
Assets: $63,672

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

Sushma Malhotra (Immed Past President)

People named in this filing

Vinod mathur (Chairman)
Sushma Malhotra (Immed Past President)
Gloria Mathur (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Assist LMI population with entrepreneurial support education and training. Humanitarian efforts include free health and diabetes screenings and feed the homeless.

What it reported doing in 2025

Humanitarian services included free health and diabetes for the underserved in collaboration with UT Southwestern Medical Center. Over 500 people took advantage of this program. Feed the hungry program includes sponsoring and serving free lunches at the Austin and Bridge homeless shelters. Over 1500 lunches were sponsored and served.

Operating model

Revenue model: Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 38
Transparency & Controls: 100
Sustainability: 54
Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 35.4%; rating input score 35
Program expense ratio: 42%; rating input score 42

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

Operating margin: 15.6%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.67; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: -15.9% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 35.4% of revenue deployed · 42% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
Schedules: 3 filed schedules
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 35/100.
Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 42/100.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.