Greater Columbus Arts Council

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
310833384
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Columbus, OH, USA
Phone
+16142218806
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts Council/Agency

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$22,398,605
Expenses
$25,151,602
Assets
$15,191,269
Liabilities
$6,463,948

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

31 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MITCH MENCHACA (PRESIDENT)
  • THOMAS KATZENMEYER (FORMER PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • THOMAS KATZENMEYER (FORMER PRESIDENT): $396,278 total reported compensation
  • KAYLA GREEN (CFO): $195,851 total reported compensation
  • JAMI GOLDSTEIN (CHIEF CREATIVE OFFICER): $187,318 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To champion and elevate the arts and cultural expression of Greater Columbus.

What it reported doing in 2025

Film columbusfilm columbus aims to grow the film industry in columbus and central Ohio by creating jobs and providing significant economic impact for the area. Film columbus strives to build columbus as a top city for film education, exhibition, and production. Beginning in 2020, film columbus became a divison of gcac.art in public placesin 2025 gcac launched the greater columbus public art strategy, the first ever comprehensive public art plan for columbus and franklin county. It laid the groundwork for an art in public places program at gcac to provide resources to artists, businesses, neighborhoods and others who want to: create public art, conduct public engagement for community input on public art projects, develop new public art plans focused on both artists and neighborhood equity, directly commission public art and provide guidance and assistance for projects on public property that need to navigate city and county services and permits.community arts programs: junior achievementthe program is the world's larget organization dedicated to educating students about workforce readiness, entrepreneureship, and financial literacy through experiences, hands on programs. Junior achievement programs help prepare young people for the real world by showing them how to generate wealth and effectively manage it, how to create jobs which make their communities more robust, and how to apply entrepreneurial thinking to the workforce. Studends put these lessons into action and learn the value of contributing to their communities.broad & highgcac's partnership with wosu helps produce a televised program to promote greater appreciation of the arts and cultural opportunities available in central Ohio. The program has gone on to win numerous regional emmy awards, recognizing their efforts to promote and celebrate local arts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 91% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 83% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 64
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.8%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $815.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.3%; rating input score 99; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.3%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 99.8% of revenue deployed · 88.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 25 of 25 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $22.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $396K · 31 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $692K reported
  • Consistency: 43 of 44 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 138 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 132 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.