Greater Cleveland Sports Commission

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311381131
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Phone
216-621-0600
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,316,802
Expenses
$10,333,613
Assets
$2,957,180
Liabilities
$1,061,589

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

90 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • DAVID GILBERT (EXEC.DIR.(SEE SCH.J, PART III)): $761,964 total reported compensation
  • MICHAEL E MULHALL (SVP BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT & REVENUE): $218,864 total reported compensation
  • RACHAEL STENTZ-BAUGHER (SVP ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT): $203,949 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To measurably improve the economy of Greater Cleveland and enrich the community by attracting, creating, managing and enhancing significant sporting and competitive events.

What it reported doing in 2024

See schedule ogreater cleveland sports commission (gcsc)'s mission is to measurably improve the economy of greater cleveland and enrich the community by attracting, creating, managing, and enhancing significant sporting and competitive events. Gcsc takes the unique approach of becoming a management and financial partner in each event with the goal of producing events that are more successful in cleveland than other cities in which they have been held. Gcsc is a section 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization governed by a committed group of trustees representing some of the region's most esteemed private, public and not-for-profit institutions. The organization's full-time staff oversees sports development, marketing, communications, fundraising and events management. We have experienced tremendous growth and the entrepreneurial spirit abounds within the organization. Gcsc is funded by contributions from the board of trustees, an annual benefit, the greater cleveland sports awards, fees from a partnership with the Ohio bureau of motor vehicles, revenue earned from events, foundations and public support from cuyahoga county and the city of cleveland. Gcsc board members enthusiastically support the organization's operating budget with 100% of the board participating in the corporate membership program or providing budget-reducing value in kind annually. Originally formed in 1993, gcsc was re-founded in 2000. Since that time, gcsc has been directly responsible for attracting and creating over 260 sporting events and activities to the greater cleveland area, generating more than $960 million in economic impact. Gcsc has established itself as a revenue-generating entity that has become an integral part of cleveland's economic future. Sports commission events have rapidly become valued community assets. While sports commission events mean tens of millions of annual dollars to the local economy, they also add much more. Cleveland has been featured on dozens of hours of national television programs and more than 1,000,000 fans have seen the excitement of a variety of sports competitions. Youth and community outreach programs are routinely planned to enhance community impact. As an economic impact study conducted by the csu levin college of urban affairs for the international children's games (2004) concluded, "the games produced substantial non-pecuniary gains that could prove more important for the city and region in the long run. They provided an opportunity for people who had never been to the region and would not have visited otherwise to experience an exciting, diverse, and friendly city. Likewise, local visitors and volunteers to the events reported that their own impressions of the city and region had improved because of their positive experience. Their pride in the region increased and they are more appreciative of the region's assets." gcsc also sponsors youth education through sports (yes) programs, which have three goals: to provide children with an opportunity for physical activity; to allow access to unique experiences; and to offer health and wellness education. There are generally 5-7 yes programs held annually, depending on the slate of events in that year. During 2024, 1,948 volunteers provided 18,860 hours and 3,838 completed shifts for 8 events: 24th annual sports awards, ncaa division ii swimming and diving championship, ncaa women's basketball final four, pan american masters games, world yoyo contest, tennis in the land, ncaa division i xc regional, and pickle in the land.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 86% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 93
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: $25.02 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -41.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.6%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 9 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 85 of 85 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $762K · 90 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.