Greater Cincinnati Coalition for the Homeless
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311682398
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2011
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Phone
- 5134217803
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $378,913
- Expenses
- $359,859
- Assets
- $388,205
- Liabilities
- $21,478
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Josh Spring (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Josh Spring (Executive Director): $59,833 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
ERADICATION OF HOMELESSNESS: The Greater Cincinnati Homeless Coalition is a unified social action agency, fully committed to its ultimate goal: the eradication of homelessness with respect for the dignity and diversity of its membership, people experiencing homelessness and the community. Our Coalition works towards this goal by coordinating services, educating the public, and engaging in grassroots organizing and advocacy.
What it reported doing in 2024
ADVOCACY, COMMUNITY ORGANIZING & POLICY (GREATER CINCINNATI UNITED HOMELESS CONGRESS): 2025 was the year of the Homeless Congress! The Greater Cincinnati United Homeless Congress was birthed following the historic lawsuit that was settled between us and the City of Cincinnati. The Homeless Congress was established to represent those experiencing homelessness in all forms: whether outdoors, bouncing from couch to couch, in a car, or shelter living, we desired every voice, because, while systemic, the experience of homelessness is not monolithic. In 2025, we were able to establish consistent meeting times with our folks at both Shelterhouse's men's and women's shelters, Our Daily Bread (ODB), Bethany House family shelter, outdoor camps, and at the library. The formation of this group excited many of our folks and dozens of people were interested in joining. This led to the group deciding to formalize membership. The group decided elected representation from each form of homelessness would establish the authenticity of the group. Thus, elections were held at each shelter, ODB, and libraries. People nominated themselves or someone else. After a month of elections at the shelters, the Greater Cincinnati United Homeless Congress had its first official meeting of elected representatives in February 2025 and hasn't looked back! The Homeless Congress had several victories this year. The group drove to Washington D.C. to participate in the National Homeless Coalition's rally on Capitol Hill. More than 20 people made the trip, and also met with several other individuals who were leading their own Homeless Unions in their respective cities. The momentum from the D.C. trip led to us being featured in several articles from WLWT, WCPO and Enquirer, which included front page coverage! In an open luncheon at Christ Cathedral, the Congress invited individuals with lived experience of homelessness to discuss what they would like to see happen in Cincinnati. More truly affordable housing was highlighted as the top priority for all of those in attendance and the group decided to form a petition to call on Cincinnati's City Council to create more truly affordable housing so we all have a healthy place to live. That petition will be released early in 2026! Over the summer, the Congress played a key role in planning the Fall 2025 National Coalition's National Lived Experience Training Conference to be hosted in Cincinnati. This conference will bring hundreds of people who have experienced homelessness from across the country to Cincinnati to learn from each other and discuss plans for how we can strengthen our national movement. The Congress also nominated one of its elected members to an open position on the local Continuum of Care board, known as the Homeless Clearinghouse. This person was then elected by majority vote of our Homeless Coalition Member Organizations, and appointed to the Clearinghouse, which decides how to strategically manage federal homeless response funds. ADVOCACY, COMMUNITY ORGANIZING & POLICY (TENANT ORGANIZING): We will never have enough affordable housing to end homelessness if we don't save the affordable housing we do have and build power to secure more. We both build power and save homes, through organizing with Tenants. When Tenants come together as one collective body, the group can overcome slumlords and greedy developers, reverse years of neglect and save their homes not only for themselves, but generations to come. Tenant organizing is our most powerful work to build power to fight against poor housing conditions, fight gentrification, and keep existing affordable housing affordable. Tenant organizing builds grassroots power necessary to achieve an equitable Cincinnati, accessible to us all. We have been organizing with Tenants at Williamsburg Apartments, which sits in Cincinnati, Springfield Township and Wyoming, for three years. When we got involved, Tenants were staring down the barrel of abhorrent living conditio
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.3%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 77.3%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.6%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.3% of revenue deployed · 77.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $278K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.