Greater Brookland Intergenerational Village

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
843573767
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Rating
45
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$151,982
Expenses
$150,122
Assets
$41,688

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Bessie Watts (Board President)
  • Saunte Nicole Furnace (Executive Director)
  • Nadia Mercer (Interim Executive Director)
  • Christina Fenton (Interim Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Bessie Watts (Board President)
  • Lindsay Jordan (Treasurer)
  • Jodi Narde (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Greater Brookland Intergenerational Village is a grassroots nonprofit dedicated to helping neighbors develop the relationships & tools we need to age successfully in our community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Member Social: Come and meet new neighbors enjoy familiar faces and pick up your GBIV tote bag if you havent already! Come say hello and continue to build relationships with your neighbors. All Member Socials are potluck optional. If youd like to bring something to share please plan to arrive with it within the first 30 minutes of the social by 3:30 PM. This helps ensure food is enjoyed during the gathering and doesnt leave the host with too many leftovers. Cant make this one? Our goal to host one Social Hour each month rotating to each neighborhood in our Village. Perhaps the next one could be at your home.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 3
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 2.6%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 3

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 76.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -12.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 2.6% of revenue deployed · 2.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.