Greater Bridgman Area Chamber of Commerce and Growth Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204154224
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Bridgman, MI, USA
Phone
2694654413
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Urban, Community Economic Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$86,543
Expenses
$76,222
Assets
$56,078
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARTY MASON (PRESIDENT)
  • CHERI HEWARD (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARTY MASON (PRESIDENT)
  • CHERI HEWARD (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • AMANDA DREW (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation, the greater bridgman area chamber of commerce and growth alliance is organized for the specific purpose of undertaking programs and activities that contribute to the advancement of the greater bridgman community as a place to visit, live, work and play; to promote economic development oppotunities for new business location and existing business expansion and to engage in any activities related or incidental thereto which may be permitted pursuant to Michigan public act 162 of 1982, as amended, and to seek and maintain recognition as a "tax-exempt" charitable organization pursuant to section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.

What it reported doing in 2024

Providing chamber, economic, and community development services and promoting the lake to grapes region.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.1%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.9%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -67.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $76K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.