Great Turning Catholic Worker Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923450863
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Madison, WI, USA
Phone
6082448473
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Temporary Housing
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$90,352
Expenses
$20,326
Assets
$356,553
Liabilities
$121,369

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Justin Novotney (President)
  • Andrea Novotney (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Justin Novotney (President)
  • Andrea Novotney (Vice President)
  • Marilyn Feil (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Great Turning Catholic Worker, Inc. GTCW is part of an international community of houses of hospitality and farms known as The Catholic Worker Movement. Our mission is to assist those in need of housing or experiencing homelessness, particularly refugees and immigrants, as well as families with children, women and mothers, and those who are marginalized in Madison, WI and to live in an intentional Christian community inspired by the tradition of The Catholic Worker. It is the privilege and duty of GTCW to not only charitably provide the basics like shelter, education, and food to those in need in Madison, but also to educate and build community with those persons with whom we live and encounter.

What it reported doing in 2024

Offered hospitality to individuals and families experiencing homelessness.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 21.4%; rating input score 21
  • Program expense ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 77.5%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.54; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -68.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 21.4% of revenue deployed · 95.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $19K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.